More Info

Help title

Help content

Upgrade to premium membership

You have reached the maximum number of players that you can follow. Upgrade now to follow more.

cookies_acceptance

important

To give you the best experience, we use cookies to remember your settings and personalise your pages and social media. Please click Accept if you are happy for us to do this. To find out more about our use of cookies please see our cookie policy.

Explaining level changes

This calculation is done in two main parts; first work out the adjustment needed to match the results and then apply damping. This means that levels should always be 'about right' but the time taken to get there or the volatility is dependent on the damping.
A level also has 'level confidence' which drops if players haven't played for a long time or have had enexpected results. As low confidence levels adjust more quickly than high confidence levels, it allows these players to find their level more quickly without impacting their opponent's level too much.
Point scores are used as well as game scores for accuracy - particularly important for 3-0 results - though we can work with game scores only too, albeit with more damping.
Mismatched players are allowed for - you don't have to hammer your opponent. See explanation above if this applies to this match.
The section on damping is where we still have some options. We have recently made a change to damp league matches more than tournament matches and box matches even more than that. This gives added weight to the more important matches.
There are occasional, very small adjustments made to all players to keep the averages constant which are not covered here.
You don't get a bonus just for winning - if you want to go up you have to play better than expected against your opponent.
We have spent more than 5 years fine tuning the level calculations based on tens of thousands of match results and a great deal of feedback from players, team captains and coaches. It's the most usable and accurate ranking system there is in any sport, let alone squash.
For a more complete explanation of how levels are calculated (on which this system is based) see the help file here.
If you have thoughts/opinions on the above or any feedback on the way levels are calculated or updated, please contact us. We welcome all feedback, although we are keen squash players ourselves and would pefer to be on-court than in front of a screen so please be patient and please do try to see if your question has already been answered on the help page. We are unable to answer questions about hard anyone played in their match - we only get to see the results - and if your level didn't increase as expected please make sure you've looked at the above explanation before contacting us. If you want to go up the levels, train harder, listen to your coach and win more points. Or just be incredibly talented!

SquashLevels calculations

Stuart Lipscombe v Grant Bryant (Sat 20 Jan 2018)

Match won by Stuart Lipscombe. Result: 3-0.

Starting level for Stuart Lipscombe: 3,334, level confidence: 62%.
Starting level for Grant Bryant: 3,423, level confidence: 78%. Set manually.
Grant Bryant to win as he is currently playing 3% better than Stuart Lipscombe.

Stuart Lipscombe won all of the games. There are no points scores.
This games result would be expected if he was better by around 55% or more.
This result only has game scores. Less accurate but we can still work with it.

Stuart Lipscombe has played significantly better in this match than his level suggests and this is backed up by his last three results so use accelerated level adjustment to get his level right more quickly. As a result, his pre-match level has been increased to 3698. The remaining calculations use this as his level coming in to this match.

Assuming that any level changes are shared between both players, for this result it looks like Stuart Lipscombe actually played at a level of 4,707 and Grant Bryant at a level of 2,689. Without any damping, both players would need to be adjusted by 27% to match this result.
Without points scores, the adjustment has been reduced to 14%.

Factoring in the relative levels of confidence which allows players with low confidence in their levels to change more quickly, the adjustment for Stuart Lipscombe changes to +14% and Grant Bryant changes to -11%.

After applying standard match damping, the adjustment for Stuart Lipscombe becomes +5.3% and for Grant Bryant becomes -4.5%.

Given Stuart Lipscombe's level and the type of match played, an additional damping of 83% has been applied to his level change.

Given Grant Bryant's level and the type of match played, an additional damping of 76% has been applied to his level change.

Apply match/event weighting of 40% for 'Club match' so the adjustment for Stuart Lipscombe is +1.2% and for Grant Bryant is -1%.

Including the accelerated level adjustment, the total adjustment for Stuart Lipscombe is +12%.

Increase level confidence due to one more match played. Stuart Lipscombe: 79%, Grant Bryant: 88%. Reduce level confidence based on how unexpected the result is. Stuart Lipscombe: 59%, Grant Bryant: 66%.

Final level for Stuart Lipscombe: 3,741, level confidence: 59%.
Final level for Grant Bryant: 3,389, level confidence: 66%.